Customer Reviews Jockey Elance® Bikini - 3 Pack
Write A ReviewRating Summmary:
556
556 total reviewsReview Breakdown:
67%5Rated 5 stars out of 5
14%4Rated 4 stars out of 5
9%3Rated 3 stars out of 5
4%2Rated 2 stars out of 5
6%1Rated 1 star out of 5
Additional Reviews
Sort by:
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
They looked they might work they didn't fit the way i like.
James M,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Pretty nice underwear. What's up with the clown colors? I won't buy anymore until I see a set of all grey for the same price.
11,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Don't like the print or colors. Don't feel like 100% cotton.
Tuc,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at JockeyIncentivized Review
This review was submitted as a sweepstakes or contest entry in exchange for an opportunity to win a prize.
Great underwear just wish motte solid colors, would buy more but in solid colors!
LTJGBRET,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
I have a 39" waist so I ordered XL which is supposed to stretch to 44".
As I was putting on my third new pair my finger went right through the material to create a hole. What a poorly manufactured product. I cannot believe Jockey put their name on such flimsy junk. I cannot recommend this product to anyone.
Salt W,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at JockeyIncentivized Review
This review was submitted as a sweepstakes or contest entry in exchange for an opportunity to win a prize.
These packages are no longer at store. Must be bought on line (which is not good for people that still like to see what they are buying or not computer oriented.
Thankfully, "SAMMIE" (your associate, offered to help and ordered for me). She was very prompt, knowledgeable and helpful. I sure appreciated her help.
Sylvia S,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at JockeyIncentivized Review
This review was submitted as a sweepstakes or contest entry in exchange for an opportunity to win a prize.
Fabric should thicker because it is so thin they're almost see through. Also after a few months of washing they lose their support and get saggy at the bottom of my butt. Fit is good when new though. I only line dry them.
YugNPLP,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
This product fits true to size. They are somewhat snug in the front.
Ollie3,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Too skimpy for my taste. I returned these for credit.
Dr J,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
I have been been wearing these since 1982. Comfy and stylish.! I had pairs from the 1980's last over 20 years. They discontinued these for a while, and I am so glad they are back. My only complaint is the the cotton quality is now very low, and you might get 6 months out of them at best. Could use more color selections also.
now
Steve O,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at JockeyIncentivized Review
This review was submitted as a sweepstakes or contest entry in exchange for an opportunity to win a prize.
Bought these for my husband, to refresh his underwear drawer, and they ended up becoming mine because they're not true to size. We bought the XL size he wears in other Jockey styles, but these don't fit him at all. I wear a size M in all other Jockey styles except for these; which are, strangely, the perfect size for me. Doesn't make sense why these aren't true to size.
NickND,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at JockeyIncentivized Review
This review was submitted as a sweepstakes or contest entry in exchange for an opportunity to win a prize.
Like the string Bikini better theses fet a little snugger still confrontable but not as confrontable as the string
Jjl68,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
These have only a single layer panel in front. I wanted something with a double front panel. Also, the fabric is rather scratchy. Otherwise they come in nice colors.
Chuck A,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Nice quality but does not run true to size. 2xl fits like xl.
Peter P,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Same old cotton, same old bulky seams. Quite disposable!
OBLIO,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
The fit is very loose, no support. I will stay with the Elance string bikini as it fits much better as well as support.
WillBill,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Unlike many reviewers on here, I'm finding these fit a bit too loosely for me. I bought a pack in black and they fit nice and snug. I loved them. I went and bought a few more packs, and they have a bit of a sag in the seat. And this is after a wash and hot dry. I don't want to be rearranging and pulling them up in the back all day. I've got more pairs to try on, but I am a little disappointed. Maybe like others here have said, they just don't have a tight control on the sizing during manufacturing. I'll run them through a wash and dry again and see how they fit. It would be great if they could really dial in the fit, like they do with women's bras. Show fit as a spectrum from looser to more snug and let men choose their fit. For all the R&D that goes into these, I'm sure they could do more to control the fit. Also, as far as color choices go- I don't want women's underwear (though some guys might). I want men's underwear in more color and pattern choices. Let's face it- we're wearing bikini briefs- my manhood is not threatened by a colorful print, the color purple, green, pink, etc. Is Jockey hesitant to show the range of men's preferences? Do some male customers feel threatened by a range of colorful, smaller underwear? Perhaps there are reasons I'm not considering...
BaySwimmer,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Probably too lose fitting, lacks support. Not sure this would be first choice.
TSOL,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
They weren't too roomy. I ordered my normal size (medium) and I found myself being squished a little too much. Mind you, I expect that with briefs to an extent, but this was a little too much. The material is great, though, and I like the patterns.
P-Dale,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Ok. Fit and material, especially the seams at the leg opening, not as good as previous purchase of same style.
R F,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Not as Comfortable as they looked. Don't really like them.
J D,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Not very comfortable. Fabric is just ok. Pretty tight where they needs to be the proper room. Not very true to size. A big miss for me. Sorry jockey.
Derrick,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Great fit, look good, and not a bad price. Biggest complaint is the thickness of the seams and waistband. They tend to dig into your skin a bit and can hurt after wearing them all day.
Merose25,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Sometimes the striped or print pairs are made from a different fabric. You can tell by the way they feel and that there is only color on one side of the fabric. They are not as soft and don't hold up as well as the others. It is disappointing to get these pairs especially because the colors and designs are so limited.
Fry,
0 found this review helpful.
Overall3Rated 3 stars out of 5
Reviewed at Jockey
Very comfortable. I would have given this item 5 stars except that they wear out a lot longer than they used to. The fabric dosen't seem to be as thick.
Paul G,
0 found this review helpful.